MRO wrote to esc <=-
that being said, i've seen womans groups on facebook where these women are cut off from sex from their husbands and do man trashing. ---
"That woman's group on Facebook is just as bad" in no way makes incels less horrible than they are. Incels are a sad, pathetic, extremely frightening group of mysoginists whose anger is almost always close to the boiling point and who forever see women as "females" who are both less than human an unworthy of being anything but walking vaginas.
Arelor said to bex: <=-
By the way, I don't deal with enough people to make for a substantial statistical pool, but there was an study somewhere that claimed 92 or
94% of women prefered to be approached and that the rest was the
minority that would act on their own.
The ones that advance themselves seem to be the "Live Dangerously and
Die Young" variety, *IN MY EXPERIENCE.*
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
BTW, starting a conversation is not making a move. Far from it.
Getting close to a guy and telling him that you like that book he is reading is an attempt at getting him to make a move. When I want a girl
phoning the police because you want them to shoot a drug dealer is to shooting a drug dealer down.
usually the dudes. When a dude wants something with a girl, and the
girl is not interested, the guy rarely gets a straight answer. It is always an "I am busy" or "Maybe next week" or some other cover-up.
By the way, I don't deal with enough people to make for a substantial statistical pool, but there was an study somewhere that claimed 92 or 94% of women prefered to be approached and that the rest was the minority that would act on their own.
What study was that? Link to it? That sounds more like a poll than a
study, and it sounds more like a poll from a magazine or on social media
I added even more emphasis to your most important sentence there, my
friend. You seem to both be admitting that you are only discussing what you've experienced while still trying to extrapolate how things work for every other person in the world from your experiences. Are you familiar
with the cave allegory?
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
First off, lemme say that my experiences and reactions are my own, and
other women might have very different ones. I mentioned in a previous post that there's no such thing as a "typical woman" after all. (:
BTW, starting a conversation is not making a move. Far from it.
So.... to make a move, you are just going to come up to someone and say something like "Hi, you don't know me, but I wanted to see if you wanted to go on a date with me"? Because I've gotta tell you, that would generate an immediate "no thanks". Women want to spend some time talking, getting to know a person so they can see if there's shared interest there.
Getting close to a guy and telling him that you like that book he is reading is an attempt at getting him to make a move. When I want a girl
No, it's a way of saying "hi" and learning a little about the person. It's making a human connection. And it's a way to see if there's any hint of interest back my way.
phoning the police because you want them to shoot a drug dealer is to shooting a drug dealer down.
Your metaphor is so out there that I won't even acknowledge it, but this part made me want to ask: Isn't a person supposed to call the police and
say "I think that person is a drug dealer, because they are always doing <insert behavior>" instead of thinking "I think that person is a drug dealer" and murdering them?
You made me giggle, thank you!
usually the dudes. When a dude wants something with a girl, and the girl is not interested, the guy rarely gets a straight answer. It is always an "I am busy" or "Maybe next week" or some other cover-up.
I think there are two main reasons for this:
1) An innate feeling of not wanting to hurt someone's feelings.
2) The possibility of being verbally or physically assaulted after
rejecting someone. To see how common people lashing out after being
rejected is, spend a few minutes in r/niceguys, r/creepyPMs, etc
-+- Brightening your day. -Bex <3
... Have a place for everything and keep the thing somewhere else; this is n a
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
þ Synchronet þ -=[ conchaos.synchro.net | ConstructiveChaos BBS ]=-
Nightfox wrote to bex <=-
less horrible than they are. Incels are a sad, pathetic, extremely frightening group of mysoginists whose anger is almost always close to the boiling point and who forever see women as "females" who are both less than human an unworthy of being anything but walking vaginas.
It reminds me of what I've read of the Men Going Their Own Way movement and/or the Red Pill movement.
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
What study was that? Link to it? That sounds more like a poll than a
study, and it sounds more like a poll from a magazine or on social media
I don't think it is available online. There was a presentation of it at the Western Psychological Associations meeting in 2011 I think.
For something more informal, you have this: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-how-and-why-sex-differences/ 201104/
why-dont-women-ask-men-out-first-dates
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
take any risk or communicate their intentions outright. They act like
one of my mares: she is afraid her barn companion will punish her if
she asks me for pats, so what she does instead is keeping her distance
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
take any risk or communicate their intentions outright. They act like one of my mares: she is afraid her barn companion will punish her if she asks me for pats, so what she does instead is keeping her distance
:O
You didn't really just write that, did you? Comparing - in any way, metaphorically, philosophically, trolling - women to mares?
Sir, I will *not* continue a conversation after that statement.
-+- Brightening your day. -Bex <3
... Bender: Farewell, big blue ball of idiots!
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
þ Synchronet þ -=[ conchaos.synchro.net | ConstructiveChaos BBS ]=-
If women were more like horses, they would be so much more interesting to hang around. Not to mention safer.
Not to mention more cute and cuddly.
Dumas Walker wrote to ARELOR <=-
If women were more like horses, they would be so much more interesting to hang around. Not to mention safer.
Not to mention more cute and cuddly.
Not real sure where the comparison to horses is offensive (at
least, in this case), either. Maybe that is because I live in
Kentucky where many people (male and female) regard their horses
much more highly than their fellow humans.
I regard my dogs much more highly than most humans. ;-)
esc wrote to Gamgee <=-
I regard my dogs much more highly than most humans. ;-)
As do I! Well, in general, dogs are better than people IMO.
And I'm woke as a mfer.
Well, you are in Kalifornia, so that's to be expected. :-)
But... my comment before (which you snipped for some reason), regarding "woke" was how easily people like that are offended. It had nothing to do with the value of dogs vs humans.
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
If women were more like horses, they would be so much more interesting
to hang around. Not to mention safer.
esc wrote to Gamgee <=-
Ha! Yeah, it's funny, we are on a road trip and as soon as you get away from the populated areas, California has a completely different feel. I think people forget how big this state is and how diverse of a
population that can make.
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
If women were more like horses, they would be so much more interesting to hang around. Not to mention safer.
Damn, my twit list is filling up today...
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
Arelor wrote to bex <=-
If women were more like horses, they would be so much more interesting to hang around. Not to mention safer.
Damn, my twit list is filling up today...
No horse has ever added somebody to a BBS Twit filter because
that person said something the horse didn't want to hear.
Point for the horses.
I've seen swastikas on front doors,
people in trucks acting like
idiots towards Prius drivers.
I've seen swastikas on front doors, confederate flags, TRUMP 2024 banners, people protesting vaccines on overpasses, people in trucks acting like
idiots towards Prius drivers. and trucks blocking Tesla charging stations.
You're right, you don't have to go far.
Damn, my twit list is filling up today...
No horse has ever added somebody to a BBS Twit filter because that person said
something the horse didn't want to hear.
Point for the horses.
"They" tell us that this kind of things only happens in "the South" but I have never seen any of those things aside from Confederate flags (which I have not seen lately) and Trump banners. I have not seen anything else
like the rest of those things.
So maybe when they say "the South" they are confused and mean California?
Damn, my twit list is filling up today...
No horse has ever added somebody to a BBS Twit filter because that person said
something the horse didn't want to hear.
Point for the horses.
I've seen swastikas on front doors, confederate flags, TRUMP 2024 banners, people protesting vaccines on overpasses, people in trucks acting like idiots towards Prius drivers. and trucks blocking Tesla charging stations.
You're right, you don't have to go far.
"They" tell us that this kind of things only happens in "the South" but I have never seen any of those things aside from Confederate flags (which I have not seen lately) and Trump banners. I have not seen anything else
like the rest of those things.
So maybe when they say "the South" they are confused and mean California?
* SLMR 2.1a * I before E except after C, huh? Weird.....
Damn, my twit list is filling up today...
No horse has ever added somebody to a BBS Twit filter because that person
said
something the horse didn't want to hear.
Point for the horses.
i hope whoever it was added me to the twit filter.
You can find those behaviors anywhere in varying degrees. In some places you don't have to look as hard.
Damn, my twit list is filling up today...
No horse has ever added somebody to a BBS Twit filter because that person
said
something the horse didn't want to hear.
Point for the horses.
i hope whoever it was added me to the twit filter.
Their puny twit filter will be no match for the mighty MRO bot-net! :D
i think only nelgin and poindexter have me in their twitlist.
i think only nelgin and poindexter have me in their twitlist.
I don't have anyone in my twitlist, but I'm sure I am in a few ;)
On a side note, I noticed once I gave up alcohol, I seemingly gave up getting in heated online debates. Maybe these are connected.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to esc <=-
I've seen swastikas on front doors, confederate flags, TRUMP 2024
banners, people protesting vaccines on overpasses, people in trucks
acting like idiots towards Prius drivers. and trucks blocking Tesla charging stations.
You're right, you don't have to go far.
Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-
"They" tell us that this kind of things only happens in "the South" but
I have never seen any of those things aside from Confederate flags
(which I have not seen lately) and Trump banners. I have not seen anything else like the rest of those things.
So maybe when they say "the South" they are confused and mean
California?
election results map filtered down to county could tell you that it's not a state/state, it's urban/rural.
Overlay a presidential election map on top of a satellite photo of the US at night some time. Where there's light, they vote Democrat.
So maybe when they say "the South" they are confused and mean California?
Not sure who "they" are, but anyone who can interpret a presidential election results map filtered down to county could tell you that it's not a state/state, it's urban/rural.
Overlay a presidential election map on top of a satellite photo of the US at night some time. Where there's light, they vote Democrat.
Dumas Walker wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Trump-supporting counties are doing better recovering jobs than those
that voted for Biden
Source: CBS NEWS
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/job-growth-in-trump-voting-counties-in- the-bid en-economy/?fbclid=IwAR0pXdoOomWuW9xBHCG32HjviKTLsE-nw8o7YJNpINGINqvfJ2I bgC91RP
A#app
They go on to draw the conclusion that this is because blue areas have higher populations and therefore lost more jobs which, of course,
ignores that they are comparing percentages of lost jobs recovered and
not total populations.
I am guessing it is more likely state and local policies in these red voting areas that are helping in their faster recovery.
They made a pretty good case for population density and a slower recovery, not local policies. On a state level, many red states receive more from the federal government than they pay out, so there could be an argument that those states benefit more than the blue states, which could skews recovery numbers.
Not sure who "they" are, but anyone who can interpret a presidential election results map filtered down to county could tell you that it's not a state/state, it's urban/rural.
Overlay a presidential election map on top of a satellite photo of the US at night some time. Where there's light, they vote Democrat.
Not sure who "they" are, but anyone who can interpret a presidential election results map filtered down to county could tell you that it's not a state/state, it's urban/rural.
Overlay a presidential election map on top of a satellite photo of the US at night some time. Where there's light, they vote Democrat.
It would not surprise me. Big population centers tend to dilute
Sysop: | Thearcadeguy |
---|---|
Location: | Stuart, Florida |
Users: | 5 |
Nodes: | 12 (0 / 12) |
Uptime: | 72:36:03 |
Calls: | 105 |
Files: | 25 |
Messages: | 15,377 |